Mr. Johnson is quoted as saying that the administrative raises were an attempt to keep talented people in the district. Why is he not interested in keeping talented teachers in the district? Mr Johnson also compared the Central Office to the Pentagon saying "you’ve got teachers out there on the front lines doing the hard work every day and they couldn’t be out there doing that hard work if it wasn’t for the support of the central office." To paraphrase Mr. Johnson's comments, I would like to see the Central Office administrators do their jobs without the support of the teachers. Some people get that. Obviously, Mr. Johnson just doesn't understand that.
Each time something like this happens it gets harder to understand the mentality of the Administrative Staff and of the School board. For example, in the same article it is mentioned that I-SS is planning to use more than a million dollars of its savings this school year, and officials have warned that more teacher assistants will likely lose their jobs next summer as the central office is pushing for a balanced budget after two straight years of using fund balance. But it is Okay to dole out pay increases to the administrative staff.
Did Mr. Johnson really think that parents and staff would think that these raises were a good idea? The next time a teacher needs supplies for the classroom, he or she better not be told there is no money left in the budget. Parents better not be asked to provide items for their child's classroom. If there is money in the budget for frivolous administrative raises then there is money for classroom supplies.
No comments:
Post a Comment